Mike's Oud Forums

abdo nahat 1928 for selling

Brian Prunka - 7-12-2016 at 06:02 PM

In my opinion, it is very unlikely that this oud is an authentic Nahat, I am sorry to say.

The bowl, neck, and purfling are totally uncharacteristic and almost certainly not the work of any member of the Nahat family. The face does not appear consistent with the types of wood used by Nahats of this time, and the purfling is likewise uncharacteristic.

The Rosettes, fingerboard and pegs are plausibly similar and could have come from a Nahat.
It's impossible to tell much from the distant photos, but the pegs don't look typical for a Nahat of this time period.

Compare the label from an authentic 1925 Abdo George:



Note the characteristic wide-grained, multi-piece soundboard, and soundhole purfling:


and elaborate purfling around the body and neck:





Brian Prunka - 7-12-2016 at 07:21 PM

While there are others more expert than I (such as forum member Alfaraby), I have handled several dozen authentic Nahat ouds and am fairly qualified to raise questions at least.

I didn't mention the size or shape of the bowl, as your photos do not show enough to make a judgment.

Abdo never used plain purfling.
With that evidence alone, we can be sure that the oud is not entirely authentic. At best, being very optimistic, the face was removed for repairs, and the original purfling destroyed in the process. The absence of purfling on the fingerboard suggests, along with the atypical neck size, construction and shape, that something happened there as well.

There is admittedly a lot of variation in Nahat ouds, particularly between members of the family. Besides the purfling, some of the things mentioned are uncharacteristic but not necessarily unheard of. One or two odd things, with an description stating that provenance and repair history is unknown, would go a long way towards an accurate presentation.
However, the sheer number of anomalies combined in one instrument should make any prospective buyer wary.

For the record: this is a public forum, not an auction site or classified listing. It is not up to you to tell me not to post here or comment. If you don't want commentary, post on ebay, not here. The value in this site is in the membership and free exchange of information and opinions. The buy and sell forum is a service for members, not for merchants. I have more experience with Nahats than most members, and have an obligation to raise questions in cases like this.

I'm sure that AlFaraby, OudProff, Adel Salameh and other Nahat experts here will be happy to share their opinions as well.





ameer - 7-13-2016 at 05:44 AM

Demanding that people stop commenting on the quality and authenticity of whatever you're selling is a great way to generate more suspicion.

ibrahimbbm - 7-13-2016 at 06:15 AM

Quote: Originally posted by ameer  
Demanding that people stop commenting on the quality and authenticity of whatever you're selling is a great way to generate more suspicion.


We need expert person not people opinions
He can comment if he sure not just think


Brian Prunka - 7-13-2016 at 09:15 AM

I have experience with multiple ouds from every member of the Nahat family. As such, I have substantial expertise in this area and am qualified to comment.
While there are certainly others with even more expertise, it is not reasonable to expect that only the one person with the most expertise in the entire world is 'allowed' to comment. There is not a 'expert' certification on Nahat ouds that gives one authority to speak. Even 'expert' opinions are still just "people's opinions".

I offered my evaluation and was fairly conservative in my comments. I did not categorically state that this is 'not Nahat' because it may indeed have original Nahat elements and may merely have been repaired and modified. It may play great and have a great sound; there's no way to know on the internet.

My friend Najib Shaheen is one of the foremost experts on Nahat ouds in the world, having owned, played, repaired and restored about 50 or so Nahats ouds. Would you like me to solicit his expert evaluation? I should warn you that he will not be as cautious or diplomatic in his assessment as I have been.

Our forum member Richard Hankey likewise has extensive experience and qualifies as an expert. Hopefully he will weigh in.

If someone with more expertise than I wishes to support the contention that this oud is 100% authentic, then that's fine. More input is better, trying to prevent discussion is not the purpose of a discussion board. As I said, if you don't like discussion, it's very simple to avoid: don't post your instruments for sale here.

ibrahimbbm - 7-13-2016 at 10:39 AM

No my friend we can discuss and I can prove that my oud is authentic nahat 100%
All are original Nahat elements except Fingerboard has been changed to new one .
again we are waiting the expert persons to share with us .


Brian Prunka - 7-13-2016 at 11:07 AM

Quote: Originally posted by ibrahimbbm  
No my friend we can discuss and I can prove that my oud is authentic nahat 100%
All are original Nahat elements except Fingerboard has been changed to new one .
again we are waiting the expert persons to share with us .


I hope so. Looking forward to your proof.

ibrahimbbm - 7-13-2016 at 07:02 PM

Sold

Alfaraby - 7-19-2016 at 12:53 PM

Sorry I missed this thread online, but never mind. I have the photos since I was offered this oud a month or so ago. I think it was still in Lebanon when I was honored, but the photos were taken in Damascus, just outside the workshop where it had been hospitalized for general restoration !

In order to restore this interesting thread, I ask the moderator to move my photos on top of Brian's post, since it's a bit confusing for whom who might read this later on after Ibrahim had deleted his post & photos.

IMG-20160619-WA0004.jpg - 101kB IMG-20160619-WA0003.jpg - 98kB IMG-20160619-WA0009.jpg - 86kB IMG-20160619-WA0005.jpg - 202kB IMG-20160619-WA0010.jpg - 109kB IMG-20160619-WA0008.jpg - 442kB IMG-20160619-WA0000.jpg - 381kB

As to the dispute here, I'd say no one here is a real expert, espacially not myself. I'm only a fan who tries to obtain some knowledge about a domain I like. According to Wikipedea, an expert is somebody who obtains knowledge that is superior to what is obtained by the majority of the population. Generally, he is a person with extensive knowledge or ability, based on research, experience, or occupation in a particular area of study. An expert can be believed, by virtue of credential, training, education, profession, publication or experience, to have special knowledge of a subject, beyond that of the average person, sufficient that others may officially and legally rely upon his opinion. In specific fields, the definition of expert is well established by consensus and therefore it is not always necessary for individuals to have a professional or academic qualification for them to be accepted as an expert.
All we have here is therefore more like a testimony about what we've tested in person and/or seen in pictures, rather than an expertise.
As far as we all know, Brian has seen and tested enough Nahat ouds to testify about his experience, so I count on his testimony. Though, I have to admit that I have seen some Nahat ouds with plain purflings. Not Abdo's of course, but Hanna's and GHN's.
The label serial number matches other Abdo's from the same/before/after 1928, though I agree that any witty Nahat fan can make any label he desires taking into consideration the right numbering.
The same might be said on rosettes as well, but in this case the rosette does not match the other Abdo's rosettes we've seen from the same years. Unlike his brothers, who joined the carpentry shop, Elias Abdo joined the oud workshop. First, Abdo used to cut his name alone , then somewhen in the 1920's, he started adding Elias's name on the rosettes to be "Abdo Nahat & His Son Elias". Later we've seen also Abdo Nahat & sons in the 1930's, though none of his sons, except for elias, were mentioned in the history of oud making. This rosette in question is solely Abdo's, the same we've seen on his masterpieces from the 1910's.

As to the sound, I wish this is the real sound of the oud. As we all know, recording does not reveal the real sound of the oud. Was this the case here, it sounds great to my ear.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzmVEKPlChU

This was a quick review about this case .. surely not an expertise.
Thank you for reading my testimony

Yours indeed
Alfaraby






bulerias1981 - 7-22-2016 at 07:59 PM

I bought the oud for $20 cash money. By far the best investment I've ever made!

s3cr3t3 - 3-3-2017 at 06:45 PM

Year after year it seems every Alfaraby comment is the same tired trite about everything being fake.... How much energy spent on a futile pursuit of being right while always wrong!

mogaith - 3-4-2017 at 03:34 AM

Quote: Originally posted by s3cr3t3  
Year after year it seems every Alfaraby comment is the same tired trite about everything being fake.... How much energy spent on a futile pursuit of being right while always wrong!


Im sad to see this comment in here which projects some kind of negativity. I happen to know member Alfaraby, and proud to call him a dear friend, who has helped me countless times with all the knowledge he posses without even asking anything in return. So excuse me if I posted out of line.

Thanks.


MattOud - 3-4-2017 at 07:07 AM

:(
i am saddened as well.