Mike's Oud Forums
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Alternative Arabic Tuning
DavidJE
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 265
Registered: 7-14-2013
Location: Vienna, Austria
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 7-4-2014 at 12:10 PM
Alternative Arabic Tuning


It seems that most people tune their Arabic ouds to either:

C, F, A, d, g, c

or

D, G, A, d, g, c

I started with a Turkish oud, tuned C#, F#, B, e, a, d, where all 6 courses are tuned in 4ths. Now I have an Arabic tuned oud too, and I started with C, F, A, d, g, c. But I was experimenting this evening with an alternative tuning:

C, E, A, d, g, c

I like this tuning, possibly because it's closer to the Turkish tuning I'm used to, with 5 of the courses tuned in 4ths instead of only 4. And, I don't notice any downside. It seems slightly "easier" or more intuitive to me. So is anyone else using C, E, A, d, g, c? Are there any pros and cons that I may be missing?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
suz_i_dil
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 1064
Registered: 1-10-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-4-2014 at 02:52 PM


Actually consider the tuning of your bass on the maqam you are playing
so you can use either C-F or D-G or C-E or C-G ... Unusual but you may even try a quarter note. I sometimes use B half bemol to explore sikah or huzzam from B half bemol. I love the result

then the others I never change
x - x - A - d - g - c

same system for the f tuning of course

hope this answer your question




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
DavidJE
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 265
Registered: 7-14-2013
Location: Vienna, Austria
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 7-4-2014 at 11:27 PM


Thanks suz_i_dil. That makes sense, and I did/do realize that different bass string tunings make sense for different makams.

One of the reasons I like the C, E, A, d, g, c tuning in general though... My first Turkish oud teacher had me playing in Kiz tuning. So instead of playing Rast on D (bolahenk) I would be playing it a 4th lower, on A. In general, I really like the lower sound of playing on Kiz tuning. Maybe it's not standard at all with Arabic playing...but if I tune my Arabic oud C, E, A, d, g, c, then I can play Rast on G or Dugah on A...and I like that low sound. Although, for some reason, I like it more on my Turkish oud than on my Arabic oud.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Jody Stecher
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 1373
Registered: 11-5-2011
Location: California
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 7-5-2014 at 06:01 AM


Quote: Originally posted by DavidJE  
Although, for some reason, I like it more on my Turkish oud than on my Arabic oud.


Perhaps that's because your Turkish oud has been been built (and braced) to respond to that tuning and for playing in the low octave. If you tune your fifth course to F on your Arabic oud you will soon discover a harmonious response in the four treble courses. The F provides overtones that color many of the pitches that get played on the A-d-g-c courses. The "downside" of tuning the fifth course to E is that some notes on the treble strings (C, c, A, a, f, for instance) will no longer sound as full and rich and others (such as B, b, g#, and e) will sound bigger than you might want them to.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Brian Prunka
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 2939
Registered: 1-30-2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Member Is Offline

Mood: Stringish

[*] posted on 7-5-2014 at 06:34 AM


E is a problematic pitch due to the different tunings of that note in different maqamat.
If you play 'Ajam on C, the open E will be much higher than the E of Ajam. It may also create interference when you play Rast, Bayati, or Sikah, as some notes will trigger sympathetic vibrations of the open E that conflict with the E/b.

The open E works for Kurd on A, Bayati or Saba on A, or Nahawand/Nikriz on D.

Due to the extreme subtle variations in pitches in the Eb to E range in many maqamat, it's not a good general tuning IMO. However, if you know you will be playing maqamat in A, it is a nice effect. So I agree with Suzidil that tuning it depending on the piece/maqam makes sense. I don't like it as a standard tuning, for the reasons that Jody mentions and that I outline above.





YouTube lessons and resources
______________________

Follow on Instagram
My oud music on YouTube
www.brianprunka.com

My u2u inbox is over capacity, please contact me through my website
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
DavidJE
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 265
Registered: 7-14-2013
Location: Vienna, Austria
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 7-5-2014 at 11:50 AM


Thanks guys!

So in theory I liked C, E, A, d, g, c. I tried it briefly yesterday evening before writing the posts in this thread, primarily to try playing in that lower range. But as I wrote, it sounded better on my Turkish oud. It just didn't sound "right" on the Arabic oud.

This morning I tried it a bit more and gave up on the lower range due to it not sounding so good, but even in the normal/usual range something just didn't sound right. I kept thinking the oud was slightly out of tune even though it wasn't (I double checked it with my tuner).

I know nothing about overtones...but that sounds interesting Jody. Maybe that's the reason it just didn't sound "right" to me. And Brian, what you wrote also makes sense. So...I will stay with C, F, A, d, g, c as my "standard" tuning.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top

Powered by XMB
XMB Forum Software © 2001-2011 The XMB Group