Chris-Stephens
Oud Junkie
Posts: 155
Registered: 5-19-2016
Member Is Offline
|
|
3,4,5 of Segah, Chahargah, Rast Panjgah?
Anyone know why these are numbered as such?
|
|
|
Jody Stecher
Oud Junkie
Posts: 1373
Registered: 11-5-2011
Location: California
Member Is Offline
|
|
Don't forget Yehgah and Dugah. All are names of pitches and their corresponding finger positions on instruments.
Yours is a good question. I don't know the answer. I have read the answers of experts but am not satisfied.
|
|
|
al-Halabi
Oud Junkie
Posts: 364
Registered: 6-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I don't know the context in which you found the numbers associated with the three dastgahs mentioned, but I'm guessing that these three appeared in a
list of the seven dastgahs of Persian music and were numbered 3, 4 and 5 on the list (the other four dastgahs are Shur, Mahur, Homayun and Nava).
|
|
|
dario
Oud Maniac
Posts: 55
Registered: 3-27-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
My understanding is that Yegah was traditionally the lowest note in Persian music theory, and Dugah, Segah, Chahargah and Panjgah were the next notes
(some of the more ancient instruments still in use, such as folk flutes and bagpipes, still play more or less 5 notes). This corresponds to a rast
pentachord.
I don't know when Yegah was renamed Rast, but the name Yegah appears to have come to denote the lowest note and has persisted as the lowest note of
the Turkish system.
|
|
|
Chris-Stephens
Oud Junkie
Posts: 155
Registered: 5-19-2016
Member Is Offline
|
|
No they weren't numbered like that, the numbers are in the name (in Farsi) Se = 3, Chahar = 4, Panj = 5, and gah گاه means like
place, position, location something like that. So the names of these three dastgah (hand position) refers to some sequential placement, maybe having
to do with finger position on the neck, they are not in this order in the Radif as Rast Panjgah is usually last of the 7 so that makes me think the
name means something about the actual notes involved. Curious!
|
|
|
Chris-Stephens
Oud Junkie
Posts: 155
Registered: 5-19-2016
Member Is Offline
|
|
Rast used to be called Yegah in Turkish music? Interesting. And what was Dugah? Bayati? In Persian Tar playing, Rast is a downstroke with the mezrab,
as opposed to an upstroke - Chap. But it does make sense that Yegah would be the lowest (first) note on the instrument.
|
|
|
adamgood
Oud Junkie
Posts: 499
Registered: 6-27-2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Member Is Offline
Mood: 2.7 koma flat
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Chris-Stephens  | | Rast used to be called Yegah in Turkish music? Interesting. And what was Dugah? Bayati? In Persian Tar playing, Rast is a downstroke with the mezrab,
as opposed to an upstroke - Chap. But it does make sense that Yegah would be the lowest (first) note on the instrument. |
...and actually what does "yeg" or "yek" mean?
|
|
|
al-Halabi
Oud Junkie
Posts: 364
Registered: 6-8-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
It's the Persian for "one." Yegah means "first position."
Rast was not called Yegah in Turkish music. Already by the 15th century the basic primary scale in Turkish/Ottoman music began with rast, followed by
the notes as they are known today, with a couple of variations earlier on. Yegah was established as the note a fourth lower than rast. It deserved the
name yegah as it was the first scale degree in the repertory of tones available for composition.
|
|
|
bugaga
Oud Addict
Posts: 47
Registered: 9-14-2016
Member Is Offline
|
|
The meaning behind several musical terms has changed over time. Some makams behave different, like Dügah (formerly it has been kind of
Uşşak, now is a combination of Saba and Zirgüleli Hicaz) and Çargah (formerly it has been like Saba, but without resolving to Dügah, so
like Zirgüleli Hicaz from the note Çargah; in the 20th century it has been chosen as a kind of Major scale without any accidentals in its key
signature, which some people saw to be needed in the Turkish music.
As far as I remember prior to the new Ottoman labeling of notes there hast been a section of yegal - haftgah which has been modified later; but I
don't remember the source. Could have been Kudsi Ergüner was talking about this. What is left is now is the sequence Dügah, Segah, Çargah each of
them corresponding the position of an important note in a makam with the same name. Pençgah doesn't quite fit in there, but I don't know, how this
makam has been changed.
Persian music is full of Persian terms, which also are in use in Ottoman music, but with a complete different meaning. For many makam names you find a
gushe or dastgah in Persian music with complete different intervals and melodic behaviour. Additionally most of the twelve Uyghur muqams and also in
Uzbek Shashmaqom you find these names.
What I want to point out is that since the first usage and establishing of these names a lot happened.
|
|
|
majnuunNavid
Oud Junkie
Posts: 622
Registered: 7-22-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Dude, where's my Oud?
|
|
Dastgah also means "system" or "machine". Dast + gah: Hand+position; position of hands, or system of positioning hands (on a fingerboard).
So when you think of the term Dastgah-e Segah for example, you can derive that this means a system based on the third position (or third degree in
western music). As it literally can be interpreted as "System of Third position".
When you look at the formulation of the Radif and when you musically see all the inner connections that exist in Dastgah-e Segah, it is clearly an
elaborate system.
So I speculate that way back in antiquity, a system of 7 notes was discovered and delineated. Each note had a position on the fingerboard, and similar
to Greek modes, you could derive different modes depending on which note you chose as the tonal centre. Then as music developed and gave rise to
different tonalities, different intervals were introduced and became conventional but these new modes with different intervals had starting positions
directly related to the hand positions which may have became note names as they are in Turkish and Arabic music. So you now have some modes which are
named Segah, Dogah etc but have evolved differently.
(Side anecdote: I don't think it's a coincidence that there are also 7 main Dastgah in the Persian system, 6 maqams in Uighur music, 7 heavens
(originating in middle eastern mystic/philosophical schools), 7 chakras, 7 valleys (Al-Ghazzali sufism. It's the devil's work if you ask me  ) I think these musical discoveries influenced philosophy and vice versa.
Remnants of this exist today in the relationship between Maqam Rast and Maqam Segah, and Dastgah-e Shur and Bayat-e Tork (previously known as Bayat-e
Zand until the Turk Qajars came into power).
Shur:
G Aqb Bb C Dqb/D Eb F G
Bayat-e Tork:
Bb C D Eb F G Aqb Bb
Bayat-e Tork is a modulation to the tonal centre on Bb. That's why it's derived from Shur, even though it sounds completely different.
As mentioned in other comments, I think things evolved and changed, became lost, names stayed the same, but reality changed.
There is virtually no continuity in modal music when you look at the modern conventions still used, but there seems to be some inkling of some kind of
elaborate system that was used in the past and spread, and evolved, or was discovered simultaneously in different cultures.
|
|
|
Chris-Stephens
Oud Junkie
Posts: 155
Registered: 5-19-2016
Member Is Offline
|
|
Thanks Navid, I suppose that's the best answer I could hope for! I'm still curious about what those positions would have been, and on what instrument
but I guess we'll never know 
And yes 7 is considered to have many divine properties, 7 deadly sins, 7 colors in the rainbow, 7 seas, 7 days a week, 7 wonders of the world, 7
sages, the list is very long!
|
|
|
Chris-Stephens
Oud Junkie
Posts: 155
Registered: 5-19-2016
Member Is Offline
|
|
I got to ask Mr. Ahmad al-Khatib about this topic and here's what he had to say:
"I think it’s combination of things, in old literature, pre 14th century, these terms were not used, instead you read in al armawi and before him in
al farabi, they used the Arabic terms mathna and Thulath, which refer to the fingers on the oud. But later the Persian terms replaced that. And it
might be the reason that during the ottoman period, the tanbour was the main instrument and they started to call different notes based on the tanbour
frets. But still this doesn’t really answer why yegah which is one is five tones below the Dogah which is 2.
So I think these terms also have a connection to the hierarchy of the tone function. Yegah is one because it’s the lowest bass tone, but practically
after that note it goes to dogah where most of the tetra chords starts, so Dogah is perfect fifth from the Yegah but in the function it’s the second
tone and most used tonic. Then comes segah and Jahargah. Where as the c(assuming Yegah is G) is called Rast, and that means the straight and it gives
you also the maqam Rast, which is the most neutral scale in Middle eastern music, since the E and B are quarter tones, and according to old school
the quarter tone is referred to as the neutral tone. Making Rast as the most neutral scale/mode. I couldn’t find any written proof for this concept
but from listening and analyzing the music, it makes very much sense. And it explains the theory very well from its practical side. I tried to explain
to the best of my ability, I hope I managed to explain.
Best"
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xmbprobrown/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
