Mike's Oud Forums
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: A Bit More on Early Oud Construction
jdowning
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 3485
Registered: 8-2-2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 11-19-2006 at 03:41 PM
A Bit More on Early Oud Construction


The earliest Arabic music treatises dating from the 9th C to the 15th C provide a little information about the construction of the oud in those early times.
The earliest account by Al-Khindi emphasises the importance of the thinness of the body and soundboard woods as well as the uniformity of thickness - unevenness of the thickness resulting in uneveness of the sound produced.
A writer in the 14th C. tells us that Larch wood - cut very thin - was used for the belly - two or three pieces being joined together to make up the desired width. The body was made up of eleven (sometimes thirteen) ribs of equal width. The ribs were thinner in thickness than the belly. The rib joints were reinforced with fine quality paper strips.
The bridge should not be weighted or made from (heavy) precious materials (including ebony) because of the detrimental effect on the sound of the oud.
A 15th C account indicates that less dense woods produced a better tone. The preferred woods (for the body) were Beechwood (which is resonant), Elmwood (which gives a finer but softer tone), Walnut (which resists the attack of wood boring insects) and Vine - considered to be the finest choice of material.

I have never used Larch as a tonewood but know that it is a fairly dense tough wood that was often used in building construction for rafters during the 19th C in North America. It is a tree that does not grow to any great size or diameter - hence the need to join several strips together to make a soundboard.
Making the ribs of an oud thinner than the belly thickness does not seem to be current practice among oud builders but is the norm for lute construction.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top

Powered by XMB
XMB Forum Software © 2001-2011 The XMB Group