Mike's Oud Forums
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: makam vs dastgah
mary
Oud Lover
**




Posts: 12
Registered: 5-7-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-7-2009 at 09:41 AM
makam vs dastgah


Hi-
I'm not an oud player, but hoping to benefit from some knowledgeable folk here...


I'm a beginner (kamanche) to the world of Persian music, a somewhat-less-than beginner (clarinet) to the world of Turkish music, and I'm in search of some historical information about how Turkish makam is related to Persian dastgah. There are so many words, names of scales, etc that are the same (largely Persian adopted into Turkish vocabulary), but to my ears, for example, Turkish Segah doesn't resemble Persian Segah at all.

At what point did the traditions diverge? Or if they never were that strictly related, why do they share so much vocabulary?

I'm open to Arabic maqam, Azeri mugam, Central Asian versians being thrown into the mix...

Thanks in advance!

mary
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Edward Powell
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 1212
Registered: 1-20-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: g'oud

[*] posted on 5-8-2009 at 03:20 AM


i don't know much about dastgah ... but turkish segah sounds very very different than arab segah (sikah) simply because about 80 years ago arabs and turks decided to play the segah note in different positions. The result is a very differing sound segah/sikah makam ------ perhaps something similar happened btw turk/persian segah? probably yes.



View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
mary
Oud Lover
**




Posts: 12
Registered: 5-7-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-8-2009 at 12:40 PM


Someone sent me this link, which provides some interesting Persian/Turkish classical music relations...

http://www.showqname.com/intro.htm
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top

Powered by XMB
XMB Forum Software © 2001-2011 The XMB Group