Jono Oud N.Z
Oud Junkie
Posts: 1119
Registered: 12-14-2009
Member Is Offline
|
|
Maqam Zirgulah
Zirgulah is a maqam I should have included in my tune-book.
This is often confused with Hijazkar today but is ascending and is on dugah (D).
This is a basic maqam and is the oldest of the 'Hijaz with a major seventh family'.
The others being:
Hijazkar (kardani, c), Shaddaraban (nawa, g), Shanaz (muhayyer, d) and Suzidil (huseyni, a)
Here are some pieces:
It would be good to bring back this largely forgotten maqam.
|
|
|
russianoudi
Oud Lover
Posts: 15
Registered: 6-6-2011
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia
Member Is Offline
|
|
In turkish makamlar this makam named zirguleli hicaz 
|
|
|
Jono Oud N.Z
Oud Junkie
Posts: 1119
Registered: 12-14-2009
Member Is Offline
|
|
Hi
Yes, some of these were transposed from Turkish notation.
This maqam is not used much in Turkish style music either though these days.
I wanted to put some pieces into Arabic/Western notation.
This maqam is hardly ever used in Arabic style music today.
|
|
|
Microber
Oud Junkie
Posts: 853
Registered: 1-20-2006
Location: Belgium - Liège
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
So, finally what's the difference between Shehnaz and Zirguleli hijaz?
|
|
|
Brian Prunka
Oud Junkie
Posts: 2939
Registered: 1-30-2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Member Is Offline
Mood: Stringish
|
|
It would appear that it is ascending, while Shehnaz is descending.
Sometimes I think if Tatyos sneezed in the middle of a taqsim, Turkish musicians would have given the maqam a new name.
|
|
|
mavrothis
Oud Junkie
Posts: 1674
Registered: 6-5-2003
Location: NJ/NYC
Member Is Offline
Mood: big band envy
|
|
Zirguleli Gesundheit!
Shehnaz is descending and actually can act a lot like Buselik in the higher octave, while Zirguleli Hicaz seems to be a more straight ahead ascending
makam.
I've seen plenty of pieces labeled as Hicazkar that really act like Zirguleli Hicaz, and I think that especially for folk/traditional songs, both
Turkish and Greek musicians have used the names Zirguleli Hicaz and Hicazkar interchangeably (though we know that Hicazkar really is descending along
with other complexities).
It makes sense that this has happened in the Arabic repertoire as well, since not too long ago everyone in the East Mediterranean/Aegean was sharing
ideas and sounds.
Thanks for sharing the pieces!
m
|
|
|
Microber
Oud Junkie
Posts: 853
Registered: 1-20-2006
Location: Belgium - Liège
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
A little sarcastic, Brian... ?
By the way, thanks for the partitions Jono
Robert
|
|
|
Brian Prunka
Oud Junkie
Posts: 2939
Registered: 1-30-2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Member Is Offline
Mood: Stringish
|
|
Just a little joke . . . no harm intended
I have a nice Zirguleh piece I transcribed a while back from the Ziryab trio:
|
|
|
Jono Oud N.Z
Oud Junkie
Posts: 1119
Registered: 12-14-2009
Member Is Offline
|
|
Hi.
As I mentioned before, It seems that Zirgulah is the oldest of this family of maqamat. This maqam was known just as Zirgulah before 'Zirgulah
Hijaz'.
This makes sense, Shaddaraban, Shanaz and Suzidil are from the same Hijaz '#7' family but don't attach the name Hijaz afterwards.
I agree that this is a more straight ahead maqam compared with others in this family, particularly Hijazkar and Shanaz.
Zirgulah is mentioned in the Medieval sources and in the Cantemir repertoire.
Shanaz is also in the Cantemir book interestingly.
Hijazkar, Shaddaraban and Suzidil are later creations.
Hijazkar seems to date from the 1800's.
Thanks for your transcription also Brian.
LOL, too.
It is good to expand the repertoire.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xmbprobrown/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
