Mike's Oud Forums
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: The music of ancient greece
Masel
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 367
Registered: 6-18-2006
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 8-22-2006 at 01:18 PM
The music of ancient greece


Arabic, turkish and armenian (amongst others) have survived for centuries, and we can play more or less the same music that was written hundreds of years ago, I believe - correct me if I'm wrong.

Why has ancient greek music not survived? They had a marvelous civilisation, amazing architecture, art (poetry, sculpture), a rich mythology, science and philosophy. Yet we hardly know what their music sounded like. It probably resembled other middle-eastern music, but the greeks had the medium of theatre which I think back then was unique. Is there any information about the kind of music that could be heard during the preformance of a tragedy? The effect of watching the plays that have survived to this day, combined with hearing the music which unfortunately didn't would be a great thing.

I am asking in the broadest sense: instruments, scales (maqams?), composition, anything you can think of.

Thank you.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Microber
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 853
Registered: 1-20-2006
Location: Belgium - Liège
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-23-2006 at 01:37 AM


For your information :
http://www.harmoniamundi.com/usa/album_fiche.php?album_id=33

and

http://www.harmoniamundi.com/usa/album_fiche.php?album_id=978

Robert
View user's profile View All Posts By User
mavrothis
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 1674
Registered: 6-5-2003
Location: NJ/NYC
Member Is Offline

Mood: big band envy

[*] posted on 8-23-2006 at 05:45 AM


Hi there,

I think you have to consider that Byzantine music was a continuation of Ancient Greek and Roman music, with plenty of Eastern influences (mostly Persian). Byzantine music greatly influenced Turkish (Ottoman), Armenian, and probably Arabic music as well (in the Levant especially).

Because Greek civilization did not disappear or end, but just continued along with the ups and downs of history, it's only logical that the music would evolve the same way, like language.

My belief is that there is no specific music to any nationality, especially among cultures that are not only close to each other, but often were mixed in with each other not over centuries, but millenia. Nationalism has tried to make us believe that each country is specific in every way (or completely influenced by "us") to make people do things they otherwise wouldn't do.

How can Turkish or Arabic music be only Turkish or Arabic, when so many of the most loved pieces are written by Greeks and Armenians? How can Byzantine music be only Greek, when the Byzantine Empire was a continuation of the Roman Empire, and was in such close contact with Persia for over a thousand years?

Look at the names and lingo in all these musics, you'll see Persian everywhere, along with all other influences.

So, I guess what I'm saying is, all our cultures and musics overlap, and it's simply the regional preferences and choices that dictate what we feel today is "Greek" or "Turkish" or "Armenian," etc.

Ancient Greek music no longer really exists, because Ancient Greeks have been replaced with modern Greeks, with all the history in between to boot. I challenge anyone to find out what the Ancient Armenians sounded like (not just what we think they sounded like), or the Turks in Asia, or what Ancient Arabic music sounded like in the Gulf. We have ideas for all the ancient cultures, but we really don't know what anything really sounded like more than 100 years ago, before the invention of the recording.

Anyway, sorry for the long response, but this is a topic that interests me also. I always feel a connection to our ancestors when I play oud, but I don't feel the need to say I'm only connected to my Greek ancestors. I feel honestly that musicians are our own breed of people, and that by not focusing on nationality we can actually get a more honest view of history and our musical heritage.

Take care,

mavrothis

Edit - By the way, more related to the original post, a lot of ancient Greek/Roman culture was done away with by Christianity's influence over daily life. Just look at the burning of the Library of Alexandria as a reminder of how extreme some people were in doing away with "pagan" ideas and culture. Unfortunately, these waves of extremism probably caused the loss of a lot of music and theatre traditions. You can see similar situations in the Mideast, where music and other arts are suffering due to their "secular" nature.

There are modern day reproductions of ancient theatre and music, but of course they are only modern estimations, nothing more. There is written music that has survived from the ancient Greek times, but not much. The instruments are also hard to recreate, as are the sounds they produced (pitches, etc). It is definitely a subject worth exploring, as are the ancient tombs of Greece and the Near East. They are full of musical instruments and paintings/carvings of them. Music was definitely a huge part of our ancient ancestors' cultures.

I wish I could offer more on this, but I do know there is a lot of study going on out there on these subjects... :) I hope you are able to find more information on this and share it with us.




http://www.mtkontanis-music.com

"...desirable and comfortable as culture may be, an artist should not lie down in it. "
--Edgard Varèse
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
billkilpatrick
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 563
Registered: 1-3-2004
Location: italy
Member Is Offline

Mood: what?

[*] posted on 8-23-2006 at 07:22 AM


i remember listening - briefly - to a bbc radio broadcast of korean court music from the ?'th cent. and being completely lost - it didn't relate at all to what i know as music - more like instrumental cat calls with intermittent thuds.

wondering what music sounded like in ancient greece or rome or even to know for certain what it sounded like in medieval europe is just too fascinating to give way to common sense and a little immagination.

having said that, i think it makes sense to consider music from europe, the middle-east and north africa - music closer to home - to be broadly mediterranean and less specific to one region or nation - especially when played by ordinary "folks" like merchants, sailors, soldiers, camp followers, etc.. too often discussions like this get hijacked by academics, high on nomenclature.

as english appears to be the lingua franca here on site, it might be helpful to refer to "maqams" as "modes" etc., etc. and leave the tedium of renaming all that's familiar to musical etymologists.

... just like a'ringing a bell - bill
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Brian Prunka
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 2938
Registered: 1-30-2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Member Is Offline

Mood: Stringish

[*] posted on 8-23-2006 at 08:06 AM


Nice post, Mav. I think you make a lot of really good points. it's easy to get so focused on what music "belongs" to what people and forget that we are all part of the same human race. All music is part of everyone's shared heritage. And national boundaries are arbitrary, rarely reflecting actual ethnic divisions. So many empires and colonial forces have shaped the political structure of the mediterranean region, drawing state lines without regard for ethnic identities, but also spreading culture and ideas from one area to another.
We can't really know what music sounded like before recording technology (or even with recordings, because there are technical limitations to the length or sensitivity of early recordings, and because people were choosing to record certain things and not others). Recording processes themselves shaped the music in subtle ways.
Cultures that developed music notation give us a better idea of what that music sounded like, but it's not a perfect picture.
It's interesting to speculate about, though.

Bill, it seems to me that the music is MORE regionally diverse when played by "ordinary folks" and that it's among the professional musician class that music begins to have more international characteristics. I attended a series of lectures by Jihad Racy on regional folk music in the middle east, and it was amazing the amount of variety to be found throughout the region.
Also, maqams are not equivalent to modes . . . you can refer to Arabic modes, but that's not the same as maqam. We don't have a word for maqam in English.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
billkilpatrick
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 563
Registered: 1-3-2004
Location: italy
Member Is Offline

Mood: what?

[*] posted on 8-23-2006 at 09:54 AM


what i had in mind were the supposed differences between "old time" and "mountain" music in the appalachian area of the u.s. - much ado about not all that much, really. there are differences in all styles of music of course - quite noticeable, i dare say, when comparing what you can accomplish on your oud and what i do on mine (tongue firmly in cheek ... ) but i'm closer to the idea that music in ancient greece had much more in common with that of its neighbors and trading partners than differences.

the music to "zorba the greek" sounds greek to me. the fact that it was composed to accompany a dance called "sirtaki" from crete is neither here nor there. (i just looked that up, by the way ... don't think i carry this information around.) to a musicologist, this would be a tremendous difference - to a 20th cent. movie goer or a 10th cent. mediterrean mariner, i don't suppose it would.

i understood "maqam" to mean "scales in the key of ..."

- bill
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Brian Prunka
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 2938
Registered: 1-30-2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Member Is Offline

Mood: Stringish

[*] posted on 8-23-2006 at 04:52 PM


"maqam" is a much more invloved concept than "scale". There are terms in Arabic & Turkish for "scale". If I recall, the Arabic term is "diwan" though there are probably others as well.
There's a number of pretty involved threads on this board about the differences already, so I won't get into that.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
billkilpatrick
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 563
Registered: 1-3-2004
Location: italy
Member Is Offline

Mood: what?

[*] posted on 8-24-2006 at 08:31 AM


i'll check them out but would the more involved concept you mention involve subjective interpretation of the maqam - color, mood, time of day, etc. - whereas, objectively, it - they - can described as above: scales in the key of ... ?
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Brian Prunka
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 2938
Registered: 1-30-2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Member Is Offline

Mood: Stringish

[*] posted on 8-24-2006 at 10:50 AM


No, that's not what it means. It has to do with specific melodic ideas, structures, development, ornamentation, intonational inflections, leading tones, multi-octave differences (i.e., cannot be condensed into a 7-note scale within an octave, since different octaves are treated differently), tessitura (range), and other characteristics.
Key is secondary, though some differences are related to different keys.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
billkilpatrick
Oud Junkie
*****




Posts: 563
Registered: 1-3-2004
Location: italy
Member Is Offline

Mood: what?

[*] posted on 8-24-2006 at 10:57 AM


... that's much, much more than i imagined. thanks teach' - bill
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User

  Go To Top

Powered by XMB
XMB Forum Software © 2001-2011 The XMB Group